The latest auto news, reviews, prices, product and vehicle releases. Jul
9th
Stay connected Subscribe to our RSS feed
From GMM
In the fallout of Sunday's German grand prix, teams are assessing what impact the tire shakeup had on their performance.
After the tire-exploding British grand prix, the most obvious loser of the move from steel to kevlar-belted tires was Mercedes.
But, in fact, the German team had earlier pushed hard for the change. So, having won two of the previous three grands prix, why the Nurburgring struggle?
The answer could be in the FIA's clampdown on teams radically altering pressures and cambers, and switching the rear tires from the left and right sides.
Team boss Ross Brawn agrees: "I think the ability to swap tires was a good way of offsetting the stress of the tire," he is quoted by AFP news agency.
"You could use it in qualifying and then swap it, and have it in a different condition for the race."
That was banned for the Nurburgring - where pole sitter Lewis Hamilton and Silverstone winner Nico Rosberg struggled desperately - and beyond.
Lotus, on the other hand, appeared to be the big winner of the tire shakeup, enjoying a return to form in Germany, while the big loser was Sahara Force India, who had thrived on the previous tires.
"There will be some winners and some losers," deputy boss Bob Fernley told Sky. "For sure, we're a loser."
There will surely be more winners and losers out of the next tire shakeup, when Pirelli will debut an all-new combination of its 2012 and 2013 tires in Hungary and beyond.
"It will help us more than others," predicted Sauber's Nico Hulkenberg, referring to Pirelli's reverting to the 2012 construction.
Germany's Auto Motor und Sport also quoted McLaren boss Martin Whitmarsh as admitting he hopes the change will help the struggling British team "quite a lot".
"Although in the meantime, we - like others - have adjusted to the new (2013) tires," he added.
In the fallout of Sunday's German grand prix, teams are assessing what impact the tire shakeup had on their performance.
After the tire-exploding British grand prix, the most obvious loser of the move from steel to kevlar-belted tires was Mercedes.
But, in fact, the German team had earlier pushed hard for the change. So, having won two of the previous three grands prix, why the Nurburgring struggle?
The answer could be in the FIA's clampdown on teams radically altering pressures and cambers, and switching the rear tires from the left and right sides.
 |
| Photo: Pirelli |
Team boss Ross Brawn agrees: "I think the ability to swap tires was a good way of offsetting the stress of the tire," he is quoted by AFP news agency.
"You could use it in qualifying and then swap it, and have it in a different condition for the race."
That was banned for the Nurburgring - where pole sitter Lewis Hamilton and Silverstone winner Nico Rosberg struggled desperately - and beyond.
Lotus, on the other hand, appeared to be the big winner of the tire shakeup, enjoying a return to form in Germany, while the big loser was Sahara Force India, who had thrived on the previous tires.
"There will be some winners and some losers," deputy boss Bob Fernley told Sky. "For sure, we're a loser."
 |
| Photo: Sahara Force India F1 Team |
There will surely be more winners and losers out of the next tire shakeup, when Pirelli will debut an all-new combination of its 2012 and 2013 tires in Hungary and beyond.
"It will help us more than others," predicted Sauber's Nico Hulkenberg, referring to Pirelli's reverting to the 2012 construction.
Germany's Auto Motor und Sport also quoted McLaren boss Martin Whitmarsh as admitting he hopes the change will help the struggling British team "quite a lot".
"Although in the meantime, we - like others - have adjusted to the new (2013) tires," he added.